“Between Man and God” and “Between Man and his Fellow”— Categories in Polemical Context: categories in polemical context

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

One of the best known distinctions among the precepts of Judaism is that between the precepts that apply “between man and God” and those that apply “between man and his fellow.” It is generally assumed that this distinction has been a matter of consensus since the time of the talmudic sages. The present article examines this assumption by means of a close reading of the earliest sources that draw the distinction between the two categories. The discussion of the tannaitic sources will reveal disagreements about this categorization. We will review this disagreement in the context of a hidden debate between the talmudic sages and early Christian literature.In this context, we will also address the question of the enumeration of the Ten Commandments and their division on the tablets into two sets of five precepts. We will propose that the talmudic sages’ position on this question is also a polemic response to the approach that emerged in early Christianity.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw as Religion, Religion as Law
EditorsDavid C. Flatto, Benjamin Porat
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages291-313
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)9781108486538
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

RAMBI Publications

  • RAMBI Publications
  • God (Judaism) -- Philosophy
  • Judaism -- Relations -- Christianity
  • Interpersonal relations in rabbinical literature
  • Commandments (Judaism) -- History of doctrines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Between Man and God” and “Between Man and his Fellow”— Categories in Polemical Context: categories in polemical context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this