Abstract
The daily work of addiction professionals in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) involves various dual loyalty conflicts; among the most challenging is the conflict between treatment provision and imposition of sanctions. Although not trained to deal with penological issues, addiction professionals participate in judicial processes, which have huge impact on patients’ recovery process. This article presents an excerpt of a staff meeting in an OMT program which deals with the case of a patient who violated a rule. This is accompanied by analysis of various justifications for punishment according to different penological schools of thought. Practical implications are suggested to enrich addiction professionals’ knowledge and understanding of the impact of the sanctions on patients’ recovery process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 270-292 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Progressive Human Services |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Keywords
- Rule violations
- deterrence
- dual loyalty conflict
- justifications for sanction imposition
- opioid maintenance treatment (OMT)
- rehabilitation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bentham and Beccaria in Methadonia: Justifications of Addiction Professionals for Imposing Sanctions Against Patients Who Violate Rules in Opioid Maintenance Treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver