Abstract
Crowdsourcing applications frequently employ many individual workers, each performing a small amount of work. In such settings, individually determining the reward for each assignment and worker may seem economically beneficial, but is inapplicable if manually performed. We thus consider the problem of designing automated agents for automatic reward determination and negotiation in such settings. We formally describe this problem and show that it is NP-hard. We therefore present two automated agents for the problem, based on two different models of human behavior. The first, the Reservation Price Based Agent (RPBA), is based on the concept of a RP, and the second, the No Bargaining Agent (NBA) which tries to avoid any negotiation. The performance of the agents is tested in extensive experiments with real human subjects, where both NBA and RPBA outperform strategies developed by human experts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 934-955 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Acknowledgments This paper has evolved from a paper presented at the AAAI-2012 conference [27]. We thank Avi Rosenfeld and Shira Abuhatzera for their helpful comments. This work is supported in part by the
Keywords
- Crowdsourcing
- Human-computer interaction
- Negotiation