Association of quantitative assessment of the intrafollicular proliferation index with outcome in follicular lymphoma

Meirav Kedmi, Cyrus V. Hedvat, Jocelyn Maragulia, Zhigang Zhang, Andrew D. Zelenetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Summary: The role of the proliferation index (PI) as an outcome predictor in follicular lymphoma (FL) isn't clear. We have previously demonstrated that quantitative image analysis (QIA) is a robust tool for PI determination and the present study aimed to determine the significance of the PI for outcome in low-grade FL. One hundred and twenty-nine patients with grade 1-2 FL were retrospectively analysed. Slides were scanned digitally and follicle/tumour-involved areas were annotated. The intrafollicular PI was estimated by analysing a median of 10 follicles per case. Patients were divided into two groups: PI < 30%, PI ≥ 30% and clinical outcome was analysed. Among the 129 patients analysed, intrafollicular PI ranged from 0·6 to 63·2% with a median of 23·3%. Overall survival was not influenced by PI group. Among those patients initially observed, intrafollicular PI < 30% was associated with longer time to first therapy compared to patients with a PI ≥ 30%. In the group of patients that were treated at diagnosis, PI was not predictive of time to treatment failure (TTTF). Intrafollicular PI is an important predicator of TTFT for patients who are candidates for observation. Further confirmation in an independent cohort of patients is necessary to determine the clinical validity of the results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)646-652
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes


  • Follicular lymphoma
  • Ki-67%
  • Low grade
  • Proliferation index
  • Quantitative image analysis


Dive into the research topics of 'Association of quantitative assessment of the intrafollicular proliferation index with outcome in follicular lymphoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this