TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between tobacco control policies and smoking behaviour among adolescents in 29 European countries
AU - the HBSC Research Network
AU - Hublet, Anne
AU - Schmid, Holger
AU - Clays, Els
AU - Godeau, Emmanuelle
AU - Gabhainn, Saoirse Nic
AU - Joossens, Luk
AU - Maes, Lea
AU - Dür, Wolfgang
AU - Vereecken, Carine
AU - Piette, Danielle
AU - Vasileva, Lidiya
AU - Boyce, William
AU - Kuzman, Marina
AU - Csémy, Ladislav
AU - Due, Pernille
AU - Morgan, Antony
AU - Aasvee, Katrin
AU - Tynjälä, Jorma
AU - Godeau, Emmanuelle
AU - Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike
AU - Kokkevi, Anna
AU - Niclasen, Birgit
AU - Németh, Ágnes
AU - Bjarnason, Thoraddur
AU - Harel, Yossi
AU - Cavallo, Franco
AU - Pudule, Iveta
AU - Zaborskis, Apolinaras
AU - Wagener, Yolande
AU - Kostorova Unkovska, Lina
AU - Massa, Marianne
AU - Vollebergh, Wilma
AU - Samdal, Oddrun
AU - Mazur, Joanna
AU - De Matos, Margarida Gaspar
AU - Baban, Adriana
AU - Komkov, Alexander
AU - Currie, Candace
AU - Morricova, Elena
AU - Jericek, Helena
AU - Rodriguez, Carmen Moreno
AU - Marklund, Ulla
AU - Graf, Michel
AU - Ercan, Oya
AU - Balakireva, Olga
AU - Iannotti, Ron
AU - Roberts, Chris
PY - 2009/11/1
Y1 - 2009/11/1
N2 - Aims To investigate the associations between well-known, cost-effective tobacco control policies at country level and smoking prevalence among 15-year-old adolescents. Design Multi-level modelling based on the 2005-06 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study, a cross-national study at individual level, and with country-level variables from the Tobacco Control Scale and published country-level databases. Setting Twenty-nine European countries. Participants A total of 25 599 boys and 26 509 girls. Main outcome measures Self-reported regular smoking defined as at least weekly smoking, including daily smoking (dichotomous). Findings Interaction effects between gender and smoking policies were identified, therefore boys and girls were analysed separately. Large cross-national differences in smoking prevalence were documented. Intraclass correlations (ICC) of 0.038 (boys) and 0.035 (girls) were found. In the final multi-level model for boys, besides the significance of the individual variables such as family affluence, country-level affluence and the legality of vending machines were related significantly to regular smoking [b(country affluence) = -0.010; b(partial restriction vending machines) = -0.366, P < 0.05]. Price policy was of borderline significance [b(price policy) = -0.026, P = 0.050]. All relationships were in the expected direction. The model fit is not as good for girls; only the legality of vending machines had a borderline significance in the final model [b(total ban vending machines) = -0.372, P = 0.06]. Conclusions For boys, some of the currently recommended tobacco control policies may help to reduce smoking prevalence. However, the model is less suitable for girls, indicating gender differences in the potential efficacy of smoking policies. Future research should address this issue.
AB - Aims To investigate the associations between well-known, cost-effective tobacco control policies at country level and smoking prevalence among 15-year-old adolescents. Design Multi-level modelling based on the 2005-06 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study, a cross-national study at individual level, and with country-level variables from the Tobacco Control Scale and published country-level databases. Setting Twenty-nine European countries. Participants A total of 25 599 boys and 26 509 girls. Main outcome measures Self-reported regular smoking defined as at least weekly smoking, including daily smoking (dichotomous). Findings Interaction effects between gender and smoking policies were identified, therefore boys and girls were analysed separately. Large cross-national differences in smoking prevalence were documented. Intraclass correlations (ICC) of 0.038 (boys) and 0.035 (girls) were found. In the final multi-level model for boys, besides the significance of the individual variables such as family affluence, country-level affluence and the legality of vending machines were related significantly to regular smoking [b(country affluence) = -0.010; b(partial restriction vending machines) = -0.366, P < 0.05]. Price policy was of borderline significance [b(price policy) = -0.026, P = 0.050]. All relationships were in the expected direction. The model fit is not as good for girls; only the legality of vending machines had a borderline significance in the final model [b(total ban vending machines) = -0.372, P = 0.06]. Conclusions For boys, some of the currently recommended tobacco control policies may help to reduce smoking prevalence. However, the model is less suitable for girls, indicating gender differences in the potential efficacy of smoking policies. Future research should address this issue.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Europe
KW - Multi-level model
KW - Smoking
KW - Tobacco control policy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70349862204
U2 - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02686.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02686.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 0965-2140
VL - 104
SP - 1918
EP - 1926
JO - Addiction
JF - Addiction
IS - 11
ER -