Association between religious and socio-economic background of parents of children with solid tumors and DNR orders

Inbal Hileli, Myriam Weyl Ben Arush, Fahed Hakim, Sergey Postovsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The influence of socio-economic and religious background on decisions made by parents of children with incurable cancer regarding DNR orders is not fully understood. Procedure: A retrospective analysis of medical charts of patients who died between January 2000 and January 2011 was performed. The following data were sought: written evidence of DNR discussion with parents, religious background, educational level, monthly income. Results: There was evidence of a discussion on DNR in 73/90 charts. DNR consent was obtained in 14/17 (82.4%) cases where at least one parent had >15 years of education versus in only 24/45 (53.3%) cases where both parents had ≤15 years education as determined by univariate analysis (P=0.03). DNR consent was also more likely to be obtained among parents of children with income >10,000 NIS (24/30, 80.0% vs. 20/38, 52.6%, P=0.013). Parents of Jewish (22/30, 73.3%), Islamic (16/26, 61.5%), and Christian (8/9, 88.9%) background were equally likely to provide DNR consent. However, Druze families were less likely to do so (2/8, 25.0%, P=0.036). Conclusions: The process of decision-making to a DNR request was associated with parents' educational level and monthly family income, and not by religious background, with the exception of Druze families.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-268
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric Blood and Cancer
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Child
  • Death
  • Do not resuscitate
  • Parent
  • Religion
  • Socio-economic status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between religious and socio-economic background of parents of children with solid tumors and DNR orders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this