Argumentation theory in the field: An empirical study of fundamental notions

Ariel Rosenfeld; Sarit Kraus

Argumentation theory in the field: An empirical study of fundamental notions

Department of Computer Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

Argumentation Theory provides a very powerful set of principles, ideas and models. Yet, in this paper we will show that its fundamental principles unsatisfactorily explain real-world human argumentation and should be adapted. We will present an extensive empirical study on the incompatibility of abstract argumentation and human argumentative behavior, followed by practical expansion of existing models.

Original language	English
Journal	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume	1341
State	Published - 2014
Event	Workshop on Frontiers and Connections between Argumentation Theory and Natural Language Processing, ArgNLP 2014 - Forli-Cesena, Italy Duration: 21 Jul 2014 → 25 Jul 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 for the individual papers by the papers' authors.

Cite this

@article{5cda3fdc0427409e972b85db3957c0bb,

title = "Argumentation theory in the field: An empirical study of fundamental notions",

abstract = "Argumentation Theory provides a very powerful set of principles, ideas and models. Yet, in this paper we will show that its fundamental principles unsatisfactorily explain real-world human argumentation and should be adapted. We will present an extensive empirical study on the incompatibility of abstract argumentation and human argumentative behavior, followed by practical expansion of existing models.",

author = "Ariel Rosenfeld and Sarit Kraus",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 for the individual papers by the papers' authors.; Workshop on Frontiers and Connections between Argumentation Theory and Natural Language Processing, ArgNLP 2014 ; Conference date: 21-07-2014 Through 25-07-2014",

year = "2014",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "1341",

journal = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

issn = "1613-0073",

publisher = "CEUR-WS",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Argumentation theory in the field

T2 - Workshop on Frontiers and Connections between Argumentation Theory and Natural Language Processing, ArgNLP 2014

AU - Rosenfeld, Ariel

AU - Kraus, Sarit

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Argumentation Theory provides a very powerful set of principles, ideas and models. Yet, in this paper we will show that its fundamental principles unsatisfactorily explain real-world human argumentation and should be adapted. We will present an extensive empirical study on the incompatibility of abstract argumentation and human argumentative behavior, followed by practical expansion of existing models.

AB - Argumentation Theory provides a very powerful set of principles, ideas and models. Yet, in this paper we will show that its fundamental principles unsatisfactorily explain real-world human argumentation and should be adapted. We will present an extensive empirical study on the incompatibility of abstract argumentation and human argumentative behavior, followed by practical expansion of existing models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925002628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.conferencearticle???

SN - 1613-0073

VL - 1341

JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Y2 - 21 July 2014 through 25 July 2014

ER -

Argumentation theory in the field: An empirical study of fundamental notions

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this