Argumentation as Information Input: A Position Paper

Dov Gabbay; Michael Gabbay

doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311

Argumentation as Information Input: A Position Paper

Dov Gabbay
, Michael Gabbay

Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence

University of Cambridge

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Given a network (S, R), with R ⊂ S², we view the nodes of S as containing information and view xRy as x transmitting information to y. We argue that such networks provide a more general account of attack and defense as well as being able to simulate the traditional Dung approach.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Editors	Pietro Baroni, Thomas F. Gordon, Tatjana Scheffler, Manfred Stede
Publisher	IOS Press BV
Pages	311-318
Number of pages	8
ISBN (Electronic)	9781614996859
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311
State	Published - 2016
Event	6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2016 - Potsdam, Germany Duration: 12 Sep 2016 → 16 Sep 2016

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume	287
ISSN (Print)	0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)	1879-8314

Conference

Conference	6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2016
Country/Territory	Germany
City	Potsdam
Period	12/09/16 → 16/09/16

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The authors and IOS Press.

Funding

We thank the COMMA referees for their very valuable comments.

Keywords

argumentation
bipolar networks
information input

Access to Document

10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311License: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@inproceedings{c956dde8b6f24161b887ecf92a6f997a,

title = "Argumentation as Information Input: A Position Paper",

abstract = "Given a network (S, R), with R ⊂ S2, we view the nodes of S as containing information and view xRy as x transmitting information to y. We argue that such networks provide a more general account of attack and defense as well as being able to simulate the traditional Dung approach.",

keywords = "argumentation, bipolar networks, information input",

author = "Dov Gabbay and Michael Gabbay",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 The authors and IOS Press.; 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2016 ; Conference date: 12-09-2016 Through 16-09-2016",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311",

language = "אנגלית",

series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

publisher = "IOS Press BV",

pages = "311--318",

editor = "Pietro Baroni and Gordon, \{Thomas F.\} and Tatjana Scheffler and Manfred Stede",

booktitle = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

address = "הולנד",

}

Gabbay, D & Gabbay, M 2016, Argumentation as Information Input: A Position Paper. in P Baroni, TF Gordon, T Scheffler & M Stede (eds), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 287, IOS Press BV, pp. 311-318, 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2016, Potsdam, Germany, 12/09/16. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311

Argumentation as Information Input: A Position Paper. / Gabbay, Dov; Gabbay, Michael.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. ed. / Pietro Baroni; Thomas F. Gordon; Tatjana Scheffler; Manfred Stede. IOS Press BV, 2016. p. 311-318 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 287).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Argumentation as Information Input

T2 - 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2016

AU - Gabbay, Dov

AU - Gabbay, Michael

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Given a network (S, R), with R ⊂ S2, we view the nodes of S as containing information and view xRy as x transmitting information to y. We argue that such networks provide a more general account of attack and defense as well as being able to simulate the traditional Dung approach.

AB - Given a network (S, R), with R ⊂ S2, we view the nodes of S as containing information and view xRy as x transmitting information to y. We argue that such networks provide a more general account of attack and defense as well as being able to simulate the traditional Dung approach.

KW - argumentation

KW - bipolar networks

KW - information input

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85086887312

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-311

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???

AN - SCOPUS:85086887312

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 311

EP - 318

BT - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

A2 - Baroni, Pietro

A2 - Gordon, Thomas F.

A2 - Scheffler, Tatjana

A2 - Stede, Manfred

PB - IOS Press BV

Y2 - 12 September 2016 through 16 September 2016

ER -

Argumentation as Information Input: A Position Paper

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this