Abstract
Aims - To compare five anthropometric methods of classifying failure to thrive in order to ascertain their relative merits in predicting developmental, dietary, and eating problems. Methods - The five anthropometric methods were compared in 83 children with failure to thrive. Results - The methods were inconsistent in classification of severity, and no one method was superior in predicting problems. Conclusions - Weight alone, being the simplest, is still the most reasonable marker for failure to thrive and associated problems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 364-365 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Archives of Disease in Childhood |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Anthropometric measure
- Body mass index
- Failure to thrive
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropometric indices of failure to thrive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver