TY - JOUR
T1 - Anomeric free energy of d-mannose in water: A comparison of free energy perturbation, potential of mean force, and mc (jbw)/sd simulations
AU - Sendrowitz, H.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - The anomeric free energy difference between the α (axial) and β (equatorial) anomers of d-mannose was calculated using standard free energy methods (free energy perturbation (FEP) and potential of mean force (PMF)) and with the recently described MC(JBW)/SD simulation technique. The final results obtained with our new united atom AMBER* force field and GB/SA continuum water are FEP 0.28 ± 0.10, PMF 0.20 ± 0.10, MC(JBW)/SD, and 0.25 ± 0.02 kcal/mol in favor of the α anomer, all in good agreement with the experimental value (0.34−0.45 kcal/mol). Convergence, as measured by the stability of the results and the standard deviations, is reached at least an order of magnitude faster with MC(JBW)/SD than with the other two methods.
AB - The anomeric free energy difference between the α (axial) and β (equatorial) anomers of d-mannose was calculated using standard free energy methods (free energy perturbation (FEP) and potential of mean force (PMF)) and with the recently described MC(JBW)/SD simulation technique. The final results obtained with our new united atom AMBER* force field and GB/SA continuum water are FEP 0.28 ± 0.10, PMF 0.20 ± 0.10, MC(JBW)/SD, and 0.25 ± 0.02 kcal/mol in favor of the α anomer, all in good agreement with the experimental value (0.34−0.45 kcal/mol). Convergence, as measured by the stability of the results and the standard deviations, is reached at least an order of magnitude faster with MC(JBW)/SD than with the other two methods.
UR - https://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?q=Anomeric+free+energy+of+D-mannose+in+water%3A+A+comparison+of+free+energy+perturbation%2C+potential+of+mean+force+and+MC%28JBW%29%2FSD+simulations&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5
M3 - Article
VL - 101
SP - 1409
EP - 1412
JO - The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
JF - The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
IS - 8
ER -