Age related sex differences in maladaptive regulatory responses to sadness: A study of youths at high and low familial risk for depression

Shimrit Daches, Vera Vine, Charles J. George, Maria Kovacs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Offspring of parents with depression histories are at increased risk of developing depression and also report maladaptive ways of self-regulating sadness. Maladaptive regulation of sadness tends to be more prevalent among females than males and has been proposed as one explanation of sex differences in depression rates that emerge around mid-adolescence. However, there is scant information about the age at which the sex differences in maladaptive regulatory responses become evident and whether such age-related sex differences vary depending on depression risk. The present study examined two samples aged 8-18 years: 86 offspring of emotionally healthy parents and 98 offspring of parents with depression histories. Subjects were clinically assessed and provided self-reports of maladaptive responses to sadness. In the combined samples, sex differences in maladaptive responses were significant at age 12.5 years and older ages (i.e., chronologically earlier than the documented emergence of sex differences in depression). While in the high-risk group, sex differences in maladaptive regulatory responses were significant at 12.11 years of age and older, in the low-risk group there was no age at which sex differences were significant. Our findings support the possible mechanistic role of maladaptive emotion regulation in the emergence of sex disparities in depression rates and have implications for prevention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-579
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume294
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Funding

1 The data were reanalyzed using an ANCOVA, with current symptoms of depression (indicated by clinician overall ratings of severity) entered as a covariate. The results were unchanged, apart from the ANCOVA in the low-risk group whereby the main effect of sex, F(1,45) = 1.01, p = .32, partial R2β = .02, and the sex-by-age interaction, F(1,45) = 1.49, p = .23, partial R2β = .03, did not reach statistical significance. Slope estimates for low-risk boys and girls remained consistent with what is presented in Figure 2. We also examined anxiety comorbidity in the high-risk group (where it exists). We found that anxiety decreased with age. Therefore, anxiety could not account for any increase in FAM-C Maladaptive scores. Funding: This study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Grant number: RO1 MH085722, Rockville, MD.

FundersFunder number
ANCOVA1,45
National Institute of Mental HealthR01MH085722

    Keywords

    • Adolescents
    • Children
    • Depression-risk
    • Emotion regulation
    • Sex differences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Age related sex differences in maladaptive regulatory responses to sadness: A study of youths at high and low familial risk for depression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this