Affective and cognitive impact of social overinclusion: a meta-analytic review of cyberball studies

Dan E. Hay, Sun Bleicher, Roy Azoulay, Yogev Kivity, Eva Gilboa-Schechtman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Belongingness is a central biopsychosocial system. Challenges to belongingness (i.e. exclusion/ostracism) engender robust negative effects on affect and cognitions. Whether overinclusion–getting more than one’s fair share of social attention–favourably impacts affect and cognitions remains an open question. This pre-registered meta-analysis includes twenty-two studies (N = 2757) examining overinclusion in the context of the Cyberball task. We found that the estimated overall effect size of overinclusion on positive affect was small but robust, and the effect on fundamental needs cognitions (belongingness, self-esteem, meaningful existence and control) was moderate in size and positive in direction. Notably, the effect sizes of overinclusion were smaller than the corresponding effects of exclusion. Finally, the effects of overinclusion on positive affect were greater for high, as compared to low, socially anxious individuals. Exploring the sequelae of the full range of inclusion experiences–from exclusion to overinclusion–may enrich our understanding of the functioning of the belongingness system as well as its interaction with another central biosocial system–the social status system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412-429
Number of pages18
JournalCognition and Emotion
Issue number3
Early online date9 Jan 2023
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.


  • Social inclusion
  • cyberball
  • ostracism
  • popularity
  • social rank


Dive into the research topics of 'Affective and cognitive impact of social overinclusion: a meta-analytic review of cyberball studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this