Actual and Preferred Work Schedules and Scheduling Control as Determinants of Job-Related Attitudes

Moshe Krausz, Abraham Sagie, Yehuda Bidermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current study revisited the traditional dichotomy of part-time versus full-time employment and examined its efficacy in predicting job-related attitudes reflecting well-being (job satisfaction and organizational commitment) and emotional withdrawal (burnout and the intention to quit the workplace). In addition, we tested the impact of a continuous measure of actual work schedule as well as the psychological constructs (preferred work schedule and scheduling control) over these attitudes. Participants were 153 nurses in an Israeli hospital who had either full-time or part-time positions. Results showed that both the dichotomous and continuous measures of actual work schedule failed to explain any of the study criteria. Conversely, preferred work schedule and, especially, scheduling control were significant determinants of work attitudes. Implications for continued research are outlined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Actual and Preferred Work Schedules and Scheduling Control as Determinants of Job-Related Attitudes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this