Action‐evaluation and conflict resolution: In theory and practice

J. Rothman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses the use of action-evaluation in conflict resolution assessment as a way to unite theory and practice, helping all stakeholders articulate and reach their goals. A systematic plan for evaluation can both satisfy evaluative requirements and also significantly enhance program effectiveness. Action-evaluation, as defined here, is designed to facilitate and merge effective program design, implementation, and monitoring with evaluation. It is supported by user-friendly research tools, including a computer-based and interactive goal definition process intended to help project organizers, facilitators, participants, and sometimes funders interactively define their shared goals in order to better achieve them.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)119-131
JournalMediation Quarterly
Volume15
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Action‐evaluation and conflict resolution: In theory and practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this