Abstract
This article discusses the use of action-evaluation in conflict resolution assessment as a way to unite theory and practice, helping all stakeholders articulate and reach their goals. A systematic plan for evaluation can both satisfy evaluative requirements and also significantly enhance program effectiveness. Action-evaluation, as defined here, is designed to facilitate and merge effective program design, implementation, and monitoring with evaluation. It is supported by user-friendly research tools, including a computer-based and interactive goal definition process intended to help project organizers, facilitators, participants, and sometimes funders interactively define their shared goals in order to better achieve them.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 119-131 |
Journal | Mediation Quarterly |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 2 |
State | Published - 1997 |