Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acceptance of lean redesigns in primary care: A contextual analysis

  • Dorothy Hung
  • , Caroline Gray
  • , Meghan Martinez
  • , Julie Schmittdiel
  • , Michael I. Harrison
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Lean is a leading change strategy used in health care to achieve short-term efficiency and quality improvement while promising longer-term system transformation. Most research examines Lean intervention to address isolated problems, rather than to achieve broader systemic changes to care delivery. Moreover, no studies examine contextual influences on system-wide Lean implementation efforts in primary care. Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify contextual factors most critical to implementing and scaling Lean redesigns across all primary care clinics in a large, ambulatory care delivery system. Methodology/Approach: Over 100 interviews and focus groups were conducted with frontline physicians, clinical staff, and operational leaders. Data analysis was guided by a modified Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a popular implementation science framework. On the basis of expert recommendations, the modified framework targets factors influencing the implementation of process redesigns. This modified framework, the CFIR-PR, informed our identification of contextual factors that most impacted Lean acceptance among frontline physicians and staff. Findings: Several domains identified by the CFIR-PR were critical to acceptance of Lean redesigns. Regarding the implementation process acceptance was influenced by time and intensity of exposure to changes, "top-down" versus "bottom-up" implementation styles, and degrees of employee engagement in developing new workflows. Important factors in the inner setting were the clinic's culture and style of leadership, along with availability of information about Lean's effectiveness. Last, implementation efforts were impacted by individual and team characteristics regarding changed work roles and related issues of professional identity, authority, and autonomy. Practice Implications: This study underscores the need for change leaders to consider the contextual factors that surround efforts to implement Lean in primary care. As Lean redesigns are scaled across a system, special attention is warranted with respect to the implementation approach, internal clinic setting, and implications for professional roles and identities of physicians and staff.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-212
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Funding

The research reported in this article was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality under Contract HHSA2902010000221, Task Order 2

FundersFunder number
Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityHHSA2902010000221

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    • Context
    • Intervention acceptance
    • Lean process improvement
    • Primary care redesign
    • Qualitative research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Acceptance of lean redesigns in primary care: A contextual analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this