A systematic cross-comparison of sequence classifiers

In the CoNLL 2003 NER shared task, more than two thirds of the submitted systems used a feature-rich representation of the task. Most of them used the maximum entropy principle to combine the features together. Others used large margin linear classifiers, such as SVM and RRM. In this paper, we compare several common classifiers under exactly the same conditions, demonstrating that the ranking of systems in the shared task is due to feature selection and other causes and not due to inherent qualities of the algorithms, which should be ranked otherwise. We demonstrate that whole-sequence models generally outperform local models, and that large margin classifiers generally outperform maximum entropy-based classifiers.