A space lower bound for dynamic approximate membership data structures

Shachar Lovett, Ely Porat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

An approximate membership data structure is a randomized data structure representing a set which supports membership queries. It allows for a small false positive error rate but has no false negative errors. Such data structures were first introduced by Bloom in the 1970s and have since had numerous applications, mainly in distributed systems, database systems, and networks. The algorithm of Bloom (known as a Bloom filter) is quite effective: it can store an approximation of a set S of size n by using only ≈ 1.44n log2(1/ε) bits while having false positive error ε. This is within a constant factor of the information-theoretic lower bound of n log2(1/ε) for storing such sets. Closing this gap is an important open problem, as Bloom filters are widely used in situations where storage is at a premium. Bloom filters have another property: they are dynamic. That is, they support the iterative insertions of up to n elements. In fact, if one removes this requirement, there exist static data structures that receive the entire set at once and can almost achieve the information-theoretic lower bound; they require only (1 + o(1))n log2(1/ε) bits. Our main result is a new lower bound for the space requirements of any dynamic approximate membership data structure. We show that for any constant ε > 0, any such data structure that achieves false positive error rate of ε must use at least C(ε) · n log2(1/ε) memory bits, where C(ε) > 1 depends only on ε. This shows that the information-theoretic lower bound cannot be achieved by dynamic data structures for any constant error rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2182-2196
Number of pages15
JournalSIAM Journal on Computing
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Bloom filters
  • Dynamic data structures
  • Lower bounds

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A space lower bound for dynamic approximate membership data structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this