TY - JOUR
T1 - A Shiʿi Lebanese reading of Sunni Hadith
T2 - progress, inclusivity, and an empowered contestation of narratives
AU - Machlis, Elisheva
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This article assesses a Shi‘i-Lebanese debate over Sunni Hadith in the context of state formation and Shi‘i integration into this new entity. ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn Sharaf al-Dīn al-Mūsawī, the most authoritative Shi‘i-Lebanese jurist of his time, relied on Sunni compilers of Hadith, to prove the veracity of Shi‘i Islam, to a Sunni audience. Nevertheless, these treatises cannot be viewed as traditional polemics. Instead, they reflected Mūsawī’s position as a proud Shi‘i leader of a community which received historical recognition in the new nation state. Beyond Lebanon, Mūsawī perceived himself as a peer of Sunni modernized forces and thought the time was ripe for acceptance of Shi‘ism, through shared values, a pan-Islamic vision and a critical approach to Hadith, in its content and narrators, within a more humanized depiction of the Companions. Mūsawī did not deviate from classical Shi‘i notions. Nevertheless, he joined forces with Shi‘i reformists in their quest for historical reconciliation with Sunnis, within an expanded notion of orthodoxy. In his understanding, Sunni recognition of a toned down Shi‘i historiography, together with Shi‘i endorsement of Sunni Hadith, may pave the way for a cross-sectarian narrative based on a progressive vision of Islam and on a rational approach to the texts.
AB - This article assesses a Shi‘i-Lebanese debate over Sunni Hadith in the context of state formation and Shi‘i integration into this new entity. ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn Sharaf al-Dīn al-Mūsawī, the most authoritative Shi‘i-Lebanese jurist of his time, relied on Sunni compilers of Hadith, to prove the veracity of Shi‘i Islam, to a Sunni audience. Nevertheless, these treatises cannot be viewed as traditional polemics. Instead, they reflected Mūsawī’s position as a proud Shi‘i leader of a community which received historical recognition in the new nation state. Beyond Lebanon, Mūsawī perceived himself as a peer of Sunni modernized forces and thought the time was ripe for acceptance of Shi‘ism, through shared values, a pan-Islamic vision and a critical approach to Hadith, in its content and narrators, within a more humanized depiction of the Companions. Mūsawī did not deviate from classical Shi‘i notions. Nevertheless, he joined forces with Shi‘i reformists in their quest for historical reconciliation with Sunnis, within an expanded notion of orthodoxy. In his understanding, Sunni recognition of a toned down Shi‘i historiography, together with Shi‘i endorsement of Sunni Hadith, may pave the way for a cross-sectarian narrative based on a progressive vision of Islam and on a rational approach to the texts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149405620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13530194.2023.2184769
DO - 10.1080/13530194.2023.2184769
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85149405620
SN - 1353-0194
VL - 51
SP - 992
EP - 1010
JO - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
JF - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
IS - 5
ER -