A randomized controlled phase III study of VB-111 combined with bevacizumab vs bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GLOBE)

Timothy F. Cloughesy, Andrew Brenner, John F. De Groot, Nicholas A. Butowski, Leor Zach, Jian L. Campian, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Laurence S. Freedman, Yael C. Cohen, Noa Lowenton-Spier, Tamar Rachmilewitz Minei, Shifra Fain Shmueli, Nicholas Avgeropoulos, Joseph Beck, Tara Benkers, Felix Bokstein, Andrew Brenner, Eric Burton, Jian Campian, Jose CarrilloJohn De Groot, Paula De Robles, Jan Drappatz, Irine Dunbar, Karen Fink, Morris Groves, Xiaosi Han, Hormigo Adila, Randy Jensen, Agnieszka Kowalska, Pyriya Kumthekar, Mijung Lee, Glenn Lesser, Alexander Lossos, Rimas Lukas, David Macdonald, Aaron Mammoser, Laszlo Mechtler, Nimish Mohile, Seema Nagpal, Garth Nicholas, Teri Kreisl, Edward Pan, Scott Peak, Michael Pearlman, James Perry, Richard Peterson, David Piccioni, Henry Robins, Lara Ronan, Michael Salacz, David Schiff, David Tran, Leor Zach, Tzahala Tzuk-Shina, Tobias Walbert, Patrick Y. Wen, Shlomit Youst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Ofranergene obadenovec (VB-111) is an anticancer viral therapy that demonstrated in a phase II study a survival benefit for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) who were primed with VB-111 monotherapy that was continued after progression with concomitant bevacizumab. Methods: This pivotal phase III randomized, controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of upfront combination of VB-111 and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive VB-111 1013 viral particles every 8 weeks in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (combination arm) or bevacizumab monotherapy (control arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Enrolled were 256 patients at 57 sites. Median exposure to VB-111 was 4 months. The study did not meet its primary or secondary goals. Median OS was 6.8 versus 7.9 months in the combination versus control arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI: 0.91-1.59; P?=?0.19) and ORR was 27.3% versus 21.9% (P?=?0.26). A higher rate of grades 3-5 adverse events was reported in the combination arm (67% vs 40%), mainly attributed to a higher rate of CNS and flu-like/fever events. Trends for improved survival with combination treatment were seen in the subgroup of patients with smaller tumors and in patients who had a posttreatment febrile reaction. Conclusions: In this study, upfront concomitant administration of VB-111 and bevacizumab failed to improve outcomes in rGBM. Change of treatment regimen, with the lack of VB-111 monotherapy priming, may explain the differences from the favorable phase II results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)705-717
Number of pages13
JournalNeuro-Oncology
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 May 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.

Funding

are employees of VBL Therapeutics. LSF is a statistical consultant to VBL Therapeutics and his institute (Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research) received payment for the statistical advice and analysis provided. TFC is a paid consultant for VBL, Trizel, Medscape, Bayer, Amgen, Odonate Therapeutics, Pascal Biosciences, Bayer, Del Mar Pharmaceuticals, Tocagen, Karyopharm, GW Pharma, Kiyatec, Abbvie, Boehinger Ingelheim, VBI, Deciphera, Agios, Merck, Roche, Genocea, Celgene, Puma, Lilly, BMS, Cortice, Wellcome Trust, Novocure, Novogen, Boston Biomedical, Sunovion, Human Longevity, Insys, ProNai, Pfizer, Notable labs, and Medqia; stock options for Notable Labs; board member for 501c3 Global Coalition for Adaptive Research and has a provisional patent on compositions and methods for treating cancer with UCLA. AB has no conflicts. JFG has grant and research support through Grant or Research Support: Sanofi-Aventis, Astrazeneca, EMD-Serono, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, and Mundipharma; paid consultant for Celldex, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, FivePrime Therapeutics, Inc., GW Pharma, Carthera, Eli Lilly, Kadmon, Boston Biomedical Inc., Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Kairos Venture Investments, Syneos Health, Monteris, Agios, Mundipharma Research, GenomiCare, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Del Mar Pharmaceuticals, Insightec, E-Health Now; advisory boards for Genentech, Celldex, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Novogen, Deciphera, Astrazeneca, Insys Therapeutics, Merck, Eli Lilly, Novella Clinical, Kiyatec, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Vanquish Oncology, Orsenix, Insightec, Prelude Therapeutics; stock ownership in Ziopharm Oncology, and Gilead; company employment with Ziopharm Oncology (spouse); other financial interests include DSMB memebership for VBL Therapeutics, Novella, and VBI Vaccines, Inc. NAB is a paid consultant for VBL Bayer, Amgen, Del Mar Pharmaceuticals, Tocagen, GW Pharma, Kiyatec, Abbvie, Boehinger Ingelheim, Deciphera, Merck, Roche, Lilly, BMS, Cortice, Wellcome Trust, Novocure, Boston Biomedical, Insys. LSF has no conflicts. JLC paid consultant for Alexion, Abbvie, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Dova Pharmaceuticals, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Novocure. BME paid consultant for MedQIA, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Siemens Healthcare, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medicenna, Imaging Endpoints, Genentech, Novogen, Northwest Biopharmaceuticals, Image Analysis Group, Oncoceutics, BeiGene, and VBL. PYW has research support from Agios, Astra Zeneca, Beigene, Eli Lily, Genentech/Roche, Karyopharm, Kazia, MediciNova, Merck, Novartis, Oncoceutics, Sanofi-Aventis, VBI Vaccines; consulting with Agios, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, Genentech/Roche, Immunomic Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kiyatec, Puma, Vascular Biogenics, Taiho, Tocagen, Deciphera, VBI Vaccines; Speaker honorarium from Merck and Prime Oncology. This work was supported by VBL Therapeutics. Data presented within this article were previously presented in part at SNO 2018 and ASCO 2019.

FundersFunder number
Mundipharma
VBI Vaccines, Inc.
VBL Therapeutics
National Cancer InstituteP30CA016672
Eli Lilly and Company
Gilead Sciences
AbbVie
Boston Biomedical
Foundation Medicine

    Keywords

    • VB-111
    • anti-angiogenesis
    • gene therapy
    • glioblastoma
    • viral immuno-oncology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized controlled phase III study of VB-111 combined with bevacizumab vs bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GLOBE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this