Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A probabilistic alternative to regression suites

  • IBM

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Automated regression suites are essential in developing large applications, while maintaining reasonable quality and timetables. The main argument against the automation of regression suites, in addition to the cost of creation and maintenance, is the observation that if you run the same test many times, it becomes increasingly less likely to find bugs. To alleviate such problems, a new regression suite practice, using random test generators to create regression suites on-the-fly, is becoming more common. In this practice, instead of maintaining tests, we generate test suites on-the-fly by choosing several specifications and generating a number of tests from each specification. We describe techniques for optimizing random generated test suites. We first show how the set cover greedy algorithms, commonly used for selecting tests for regression suites, may be adapted to selecting specifications for randomly generated regression suites. We then introduce a new class of greedy algorithms, referred to as future-aware greedy algorithms. The algorithms are computationally efficient and generate more effective regression suites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-234
Number of pages16
JournalTheoretical Computer Science
Volume404
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Sep 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coverage analysis
  • Future-aware greedy algorithms
  • Greedy algorithms
  • Hardware verification
  • Probabilistic regression suites
  • Regression suites
  • Software testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A probabilistic alternative to regression suites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this