A pilot study in using argumentation frameworks for online debates

Federico Cerutti, Alexis Palmer, Ariel Rosenfeld, Jan Šnajder, Francesca Toni

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

We describe a pilot study in using argumentation frameworks obtained from an online debate to evaluate positions expressed in the debate. This pilot study aims at exploring the richness of Computational Argumentation methods and techniques for evaluating arguments to reason with the output of Argument Mining. It uses a hand-generated graphical representation of the debate as an intermediate representation from which argumentation frameworks can be extracted, but richer than any existing argumentation framework. The intermediate representation can provide insights for benchmark sets derived from online debates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-74
Number of pages12
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume1672
StatePublished - 2016
Event1st International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation, SAFA 2016 - Potsdam, Germany
Duration: 13 Sep 2016 → …

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, CEUR-WS. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Argument mining
  • Argumentation frameworks comparison
  • Benchmarks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A pilot study in using argumentation frameworks for online debates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this