TY - JOUR
T1 - A new antigen test device for rapid influenza A and B detection
AU - Rohana, Hanan
AU - Marmur, Guy
AU - Azrad, Maya
AU - Peretz, Avi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/7/15
Y1 - 2024/7/15
N2 - Introduction: Tests for detection of influenza must demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity, affordability, and rapidness. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the LabOn-Time™ Influenza A + B Rapid test device (BMT Diagnostics, Ltd), as compared to Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), in identifying influenza A/B among 183 nasopharyngeal samples collected between February and April 2023 from patients with Influenza-like symptoms. Results: Out of 70 participants with a positive RT-PCR result, 53 (75.7 %) had a positive LabOn-Time result. The LabOn-Time kit had a sensitivity of 75.7 % and specificity of 100 %. The odds ratio for showing a false negative LabOn-Time result for influenza B, compared to influenza A was 5.24 (95%CI: 1.35–20.31). All false negative LabOn-Time samples had a RT-PCT cycle threshold ≥20. Mean time from symptom onset was significantly lower in the false negative LabOn-Time cases compared to the positive cases (36 ± 15.3 vs. 42.6 ± 10.1, respectively). The mean number of symptoms reported per patient was significantly higher in positive compared to negative LabOn-Time cases (2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The LabOn-Time device, which is very simple and intuitive to operate, could significantly contribute to early detection of influenza A/B infection.
AB - Introduction: Tests for detection of influenza must demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity, affordability, and rapidness. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the LabOn-Time™ Influenza A + B Rapid test device (BMT Diagnostics, Ltd), as compared to Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), in identifying influenza A/B among 183 nasopharyngeal samples collected between February and April 2023 from patients with Influenza-like symptoms. Results: Out of 70 participants with a positive RT-PCR result, 53 (75.7 %) had a positive LabOn-Time result. The LabOn-Time kit had a sensitivity of 75.7 % and specificity of 100 %. The odds ratio for showing a false negative LabOn-Time result for influenza B, compared to influenza A was 5.24 (95%CI: 1.35–20.31). All false negative LabOn-Time samples had a RT-PCT cycle threshold ≥20. Mean time from symptom onset was significantly lower in the false negative LabOn-Time cases compared to the positive cases (36 ± 15.3 vs. 42.6 ± 10.1, respectively). The mean number of symptoms reported per patient was significantly higher in positive compared to negative LabOn-Time cases (2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The LabOn-Time device, which is very simple and intuitive to operate, could significantly contribute to early detection of influenza A/B infection.
KW - Cycle threshold
KW - Early detection
KW - Influenza A/B
KW - LabOn-Time™
KW - Real-time PCR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197179393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33979
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33979
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39055805
AN - SCOPUS:85197179393
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 10
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 13
M1 - e33979
ER -