A highly replicable decline in mood during rest and simple tasks

David C. Jangraw; Hanna Keren; Haorui Sun; Rachel L. Bedder; Robb B. Rutledge; Francisco Pereira; Adam G. Thomas; Daniel S. Pine; Charles Zheng; Dylan M. Nielson; Argyris Stringaris

doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01519-7

A highly replicable decline in mood during rest and simple tasks

David C. Jangraw, Hanna Keren, Haorui Sun, Rachel L. Bedder, Robb B. Rutledge, Francisco Pereira, Adam G. Thomas, Daniel S. Pine, Charles Zheng, Dylan M. Nielson, Argyris Stringaris

Bar-Ilan University - Azrieli Faculty of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Does our mood change as time passes? This question is central to behavioural and affective science, yet it remains largely unexamined. To investigate, we intermixed subjective momentary mood ratings into repetitive psychology paradigms. Here we demonstrate that task and rest periods lowered participants’ mood, an effect we call ‘Mood Drift Over Time’. This finding was replicated in 19 cohorts totalling 28,482 adult and adolescent participants. The drift was relatively large (−13.8% after 7.3 min of rest, Cohen’s d = 0.574) and was consistent across cohorts. Behaviour was also impacted: participants were less likely to gamble in a task that followed a rest period. Importantly, the drift slope was inversely related to reward sensitivity. We show that accounting for time using a linear term significantly improves the fit of a computational model of mood. Our work provides conceptual and methodological reasons for researchers to account for time’s effects when studying mood and behaviour.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	596-610
Number of pages	15
Journal	Nature Human Behaviour
Volume	7
Issue number	4
Early online date	27 Feb 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01519-7
State	Published - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health, part of the NIH (grant nos. ZIAMH002957 (to A.S.), ZICMH002968 (to F.P.), ZIAMH002871 (to D.S.P.), ZIAMH002872 (to D.S.P.) and ZICMH002960 (to A.G.T.)). This work used the computational resources of the NIH high-performance computing (HPC) Biowulf cluster ( http://hpc.nih.gov ). Data collection for the mobile app dataset was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 101252/Z/13/Z). The online adolescent sample in this study was collected under NIH IRB protocol number 18-M-0037, registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03388606. The online adult sample was collected under NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protection protocol P194594. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the NIH, the Department of Health and Human Services or the United States Government.

Funders	Funder number
National Institutes of Health	ZICMH002960, ZIAMH002871, ZIAMH002872, ZICMH002968, ZIAMH002957
National Institute of Mental Health
Wellcome Trust	101252/Z/13/Z

Access to Document

10.1038/s41562-023-01519-7

Cite this

@article{dd9970463be34d049ccae3b10b69c2ff,

title = "A highly replicable decline in mood during rest and simple tasks",

abstract = "Does our mood change as time passes? This question is central to behavioural and affective science, yet it remains largely unexamined. To investigate, we intermixed subjective momentary mood ratings into repetitive psychology paradigms. Here we demonstrate that task and rest periods lowered participants{\textquoteright} mood, an effect we call {\textquoteleft}Mood Drift Over Time{\textquoteright}. This finding was replicated in 19 cohorts totalling 28,482 adult and adolescent participants. The drift was relatively large (−13.8% after 7.3 min of rest, Cohen{\textquoteright}s d = 0.574) and was consistent across cohorts. Behaviour was also impacted: participants were less likely to gamble in a task that followed a rest period. Importantly, the drift slope was inversely related to reward sensitivity. We show that accounting for time using a linear term significantly improves the fit of a computational model of mood. Our work provides conceptual and methodological reasons for researchers to account for time{\textquoteright}s effects when studying mood and behaviour.",

author = "Jangraw, {David C.} and Hanna Keren and Haorui Sun and Bedder, {Rachel L.} and Rutledge, {Robb B.} and Francisco Pereira and Thomas, {Adam G.} and Pine, {Daniel S.} and Charles Zheng and Nielson, {Dylan M.} and Argyris Stringaris",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1038/s41562-023-01519-7",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "7",

pages = "596--610",

journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",

issn = "2397-3374",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A highly replicable decline in mood during rest and simple tasks

AU - Jangraw, David C.

AU - Keren, Hanna

AU - Sun, Haorui

AU - Bedder, Rachel L.

AU - Rutledge, Robb B.

AU - Pereira, Francisco

AU - Thomas, Adam G.

AU - Pine, Daniel S.

AU - Zheng, Charles

AU - Nielson, Dylan M.

AU - Stringaris, Argyris

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - Does our mood change as time passes? This question is central to behavioural and affective science, yet it remains largely unexamined. To investigate, we intermixed subjective momentary mood ratings into repetitive psychology paradigms. Here we demonstrate that task and rest periods lowered participants’ mood, an effect we call ‘Mood Drift Over Time’. This finding was replicated in 19 cohorts totalling 28,482 adult and adolescent participants. The drift was relatively large (−13.8% after 7.3 min of rest, Cohen’s d = 0.574) and was consistent across cohorts. Behaviour was also impacted: participants were less likely to gamble in a task that followed a rest period. Importantly, the drift slope was inversely related to reward sensitivity. We show that accounting for time using a linear term significantly improves the fit of a computational model of mood. Our work provides conceptual and methodological reasons for researchers to account for time’s effects when studying mood and behaviour.

AB - Does our mood change as time passes? This question is central to behavioural and affective science, yet it remains largely unexamined. To investigate, we intermixed subjective momentary mood ratings into repetitive psychology paradigms. Here we demonstrate that task and rest periods lowered participants’ mood, an effect we call ‘Mood Drift Over Time’. This finding was replicated in 19 cohorts totalling 28,482 adult and adolescent participants. The drift was relatively large (−13.8% after 7.3 min of rest, Cohen’s d = 0.574) and was consistent across cohorts. Behaviour was also impacted: participants were less likely to gamble in a task that followed a rest period. Importantly, the drift slope was inversely related to reward sensitivity. We show that accounting for time using a linear term significantly improves the fit of a computational model of mood. Our work provides conceptual and methodological reasons for researchers to account for time’s effects when studying mood and behaviour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149000843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-023-01519-7

DO - 10.1038/s41562-023-01519-7

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

C2 - 36849591

AN - SCOPUS:85149000843

SN - 2397-3374

VL - 7

SP - 596

EP - 610

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

IS - 4

ER -

A highly replicable decline in mood during rest and simple tasks

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this