A cross-cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations

  • Abraham Sagie
  • , Zeynep Aycan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

129 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite considerable awareness about various forms and meanings of participative decision-making (PDM) in different parts of the world, there is less agreement on the causes of variation in PDM. This article argues that among other exogenous (e.g. sociopolitical, legal, historical) forces, the sociocultural context plays an important role in the observed differences among PDM approaches and practices across nations. Similarly, subcultures and organizational cultures may influence PDM within nations. Two cultural dimensions: individualism-collectivism and power distance, are linked with four wide-spread employee participation approaches: face-to-face PDM, collective PDM, pseudo-PDM, and paternalistic PDM. The attributes of each PDM form, including the cultural determinants, underlying beliefs, the types of decisions made, and the relationship between a specified form and other PDM meanings (e.g. self-managing teams) are elaborated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-473
Number of pages21
JournalHuman Relations
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2003

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Decision-making
  • Individualism-collectivism
  • Participation
  • Power distance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this