Abstract
Since the beginning of scholarship on this subject, scholars have cast doubt on the historical credibility of the description of the results of the Bar Kokhba war in the Roman History of Cassius Dio. At the base of the discussion lie the meaning of the term Judea, the scope of the revolt and the area which was destroyed following it, as well as the estimate of the settlement sites and the population of the country in the period under discussion. The examination of the demographic data presented by Cassius has so far been based mainly on the results of archaeological surveys and excavations conducted and published during the previous century. In this article, we would like to summarize the abundant archaeological evidence that has been added over the recent years, and to re-evaluate the demographic data presented by Cassius. Due to methodological difficulties in estimating the country’s population in ancient times, the focus will be on the question of the number of settlements destroyed in the war: fifty forts and 985 villages. The findings of the current study illustrate the potential of the archaeological findings and support those scholars who viewed Cassius Dio’s demographic data as a reliable report based on contemporary documents
Translated title of the contribution | Cassius Dio’s Description of the Aftermath of the Bar Kokhba War: A Reliable Report or a Mere Exaggeration? |
---|---|
Original language | Hebrew |
Pages (from-to) | 9-38 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | קתדרה: לתולדות ארץ-ישראל וישובה |
Volume | 179 |
State | Published - 2021 |
IHP Publications
- ihp
RAMBI Publications
- RAMBI Publications
- Cassius Dio Cocceianus -- Criticism and interpretation
- Eretz Israel -- Historiography
- Eretz Israel -- History -- 168 B.C.-135 A.D., Hasmonean rebellion to Bar Kokhba Rebellion
- Eretz Israel -- Population -- History
- Eretz Israel -- Antiquities