Abstract
The present paper investigates the various commentaries in Jewish medieval thought on the miracle of the sun standing still at Joshua's command. These commentaries fall under the following categories: (a) Natural interpretation, according to which the miracle occurred in the warriors' consciousness, but not in reality. (b) Moderating interpretation, which puts forward a synthesis of miracle and Nature, suggesting that the heavenly bodies did not completely stop their movement but merely slowed it down. (c) Conservative interpretation, according to which the sun literally stood still. Sometimes this approach was forged in polemics with the natural approach; at other times it was juxtaposed with the moderating approach. The paper discusses well known commentators as well as those whose work has been preserved only in manuscripts.
| Translated title of the contribution | Did the Sun Stand Still for Joshua? On the Doctrine of Miracles, as Mirrored in Jewish Medieval Thought |
|---|---|
| Original language | Hebrew |
| Pages (from-to) | 33-62 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Daat: A Journal of Jewish Philosophy & Kabbalah |
| Volume | 42 |
| State | Published - 1999 |
IHP Publications
- ihp
- Jewish philosophy -- Middle Ages, 500-1500
- Miracles
- ניסים
- פילוסופיה יהודית של ימי הביניים
RAMBI Publications
- RAMBI Publications
- Bible -- Joshua -- X -- Criticism, interpretation, etc
- Miracles (Judaism)
- Jewish philosophy -- Middle Ages, 500-1500
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver